Variability of the Voltage Stability Margin under Load Uncertainty in the IEEE 14-Bus System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47187/perspectivas.8.2.264

Keywords:

Uncertainty Analysis, Voltage Stability, Power Flow, Monte Carlo Method, Electric Power Systems

Abstract

This article analyzes the variability of the estimated voltage stability margin under load uncertainty in the IEEE 14-bus system. For this purpose, Monte Carlo scenarios were generated using random factors applied to active and reactive power demands, and power flows were solved using the Newton-Raphson method. In each scenario, λmax was estimated through feasibility assessment and bisection refinement within a defined interval; discrete P-V curves were also generated to identify the critical bus and analyze the evolution of the minimum voltage at PQ buses. The results show that load uncertainty produces noticeable variations in the estimated margin, although a significant portion of the scenarios reaches the upper limit of the exploration interval. Therefore, these cases are interpreted as censored scenarios and not as exact collapse points. The relationship between total active load and λmax showed an inverse trend, indicating a reduction in the margin associated with higher demand levels. In addition, criticality was mainly concentrated at buses 5 and 14, while the representative P-V curves made it possible to link the statistical dispersion with the electrical response of the system. The proposed approach enables the voltage stability margin to be characterized from a probabilistic and reproducible perspective.

References

[1] P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

[2] T. Van Cutsem and C. Vournas, Voltage Stability of Electric Power Systems. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998, doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-75536-6.

[3] F. Mišurović and S. Mujović, “Numerical probabilistic load flow analysis in modern power systems with intermittent energy sources,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 6, Art. no. 2038, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15062038.

[4] University of Washington, “Power Systems Test Case Archive: 14 Bus Power Flow Test Case,” Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington. Accessed: Jul. 3, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://labs.ece.uw.edu/pstca/pf14/pg_tca14bus.htm

[5] V. Ajjarapu and C. Christy, “The continuation power flow: A tool for steady state voltage stability analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 416–423, Feb. 1992, doi: 10.1109/59.141737.

[6] Texas A&M University, “IEEE 14-Bus System,” Electric Grid Test Case Repository. Accessed: Jul. 3, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://electricgrids.engr.tamu.edu/electric-grid-test-cases/ieee-14-bus-system/

[7] C.-L. Su, “Probabilistic load-flow computation using point estimate method,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1843–1851, Nov. 2005, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857921.

[8] R. Gadal, A. Oukennou, F. El Mariami, A. Belfqih, and N. Agouzoul, “Voltage stability assessment and control using indices and FACTS: A comparative review,” Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 2023, Art. no. 5419372, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/5419372.

[9] Y. Chen, J. Wen, and S. Cheng, “Probabilistic load flow method based on Nataf transformation and Latin hypercube sampling,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 294–301, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2012.2222680.

[10] F. Milano, Power System Modelling and Scripting. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2010, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13669-6.

[11] R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sánchez, and R. J. Thomas, “MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 12–19, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2051168.

[12] J. F. Zhang, C. T. Tse, W. Wang, C. Y. Chung, and K. P. Wong, “Voltage stability analysis based on probabilistic power flow and maximum entropy,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 530–537, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2009.0071.

[13] K. N. Hasan, R. Preece, and J. V. Milanović, “Existing approaches and trends in uncertainty modelling and probabilistic stability analysis of power systems with renewable generation,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 101, pp. 168–180, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.017.

[14] B. R. Prusty and D. Jena, “A critical review on probabilistic load flow studies in uncertainty constrained power systems with photovoltaic generation and a new approach,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 69, pp. 1286–1302, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.013.

[15] W. Deng, B. Zhang, H. Ding, and H. Li, “Risk-based probabilistic voltage stability assessment in uncertain power system,” Energies, vol. 10, no. 2, Art. no. 180, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.3390/en10020180.

[16] G. M. Baleboina and R. Mageshvaran, “A survey on voltage stability indices for power system transmission and distribution systems,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 11, Art. no. 1159410, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1159410.

[17] A. M. Hakami, L. Wang, and M. H. Haque, “A review of uncertainty modelling techniques for probabilistic stability analysis of renewable-rich power systems,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 1, Art. no. 112, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16010112.

[18] IEEE Power Engineering Society, Voltage Stability Assessment: Concepts, Practices and Tools. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE/PES Power System Stability Subcommittee, 2002.

Published

2026-07-30

Data Availability Statement

Authors does not distributed the research data.

Issue

Section

Artículos arbitrados

How to Cite

[1]
“Variability of the Voltage Stability Margin under Load Uncertainty in the IEEE 14-Bus System”, Perspectivas, vol. 8, no. 2, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.47187/perspectivas.8.2.264.

Similar Articles

21-30 of 87

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.