A Framework for Citizen Science Projects

Authors

  • Cesar Guerra García Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí
  • Marco Tulio Ramírez Torres Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí
  • Héctor Pérez González Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí
  • Lizeth López López Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47187/perspectivas.7.1.239

Keywords:

Citizen science projects, Citizen science data

Abstract

Citizen science, also known as public participation in scientific research and knowledge production, is gaining more and more recognition when proposing citizen science projects. However, concerns about data quality and processes of this type of projects are highlighted. To mitigate these problems, it is proposed to standardize good practices, emphasizing ensuring data quality in all phases of the life cycle. The main contribution of this work is to identify which are the best practices related to citizen science projects and, to investigate how these practices can be enriched with others related to data quality management and governance. As a result, MAR.CI.CI has been proposed, a framework to help institutions propose and execute their citizen science projects.

References

M. Haklay, D. Dorler, F. Heigi, M. Manzoni, S. Hecker, y K. Vohland, «What is citizen science? The challenges of definition», Springer, pp. 13-32, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2.

F. Bolici y N. A. Colella, «How to Design Citizen-Science Activities: A Framework for Implementing Public Engagement Strategies in a Research Project», Organizing for Digital Innovation, vol. 27, 2019, doi: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90500-6_12.

A. Land-Zandstra, G. Agnello, y Y. Gultekin, «Participants in Citizen Science», Springer, pp. 243-259, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_13.

M. Kosmala, A. Wiggins, A. Swanson, y B. Simmons, «Assessing data quality in citizen science», Frontiers in ecology and the environment, pp. 551-560, 2016, doi: doi:10.1002/fee.1436.

GEWISS Consortium, «Citizen science for all. A guide for citizen science practitioners.» 2016. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.buergerschaffenwissen.de/sites/default/files/grid/2017/11/21/handreichunga5_engl_web.pdf

S. Kelling, D. Fink, F. La Sorte, A. Johnston, N. E. Bruns, y W. M. Hochachka, «Taking a ‘Big Data’ approach to data quality in a citizen science project», Ambio, vol. 44, n.o 4, pp. 601-611, 2015, doi: doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0710-4.

R. Downs, H. Ramapriyan, G. Peng, y Y. Wei, «Perspectives on Citizen Science Data Quality», Frontiers in Climate, vol. 3, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fclim.2021.615032.

ISO, «ISO 8000-61:2016: Data quality — Part 61: Data quality management: Process reference model», ISO. Accedido: 4 de agosto de 2021. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/06/30/63086.html

ISO, «ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2017 - Systems and software engineering — Software life cycle processes», ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2017. Accedido: 11 de abril de 2022. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/06/37/63712.html

UNE, «Especificación UNE 0080:2023, Gestión de Evaluación del Gobierno, Gestión y Gestión de Calidad del Dato». 2023.

ISO, «ISO/IEC 33003:2015: Information technology — Process assessment — Requirements for process measurement frameworks», ISO. Accedido: 11 de abril de 2022. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/05/41/54177.html

R. Bonney, C. B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, y T. Phillips, «A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy», BioScience, vol. 59, pp. 977-984, 2009.

J. C. Tweddle, P. F. Fisher, M. J. Pocock, y H. E. Roy, «Guide to citizen science: developing, implementing and evaluating citizen science to study biodiversity and the environment in the UK». Natural History Museum and NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology for UK-EOF, 2012. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/citizenscienceguide.pdf

D. Acevedo Caradeux, «Ciencia Ciudadana. Principios, Herramientas, Proyectos de Medio Ambiente». Fundación Ciencia Ciudadana. Embajada de Canadá, 2018. [En línea]. Disponible en: http://cienciaciudadana.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/libro-CC-OK.pdf

ECSA, «Ten Principles of Citizen Science». ECSA (European Citizen Science Association), 2015. [En línea]. Disponible en: doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XPR2N

CitizenScience.gov, «Federal Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science Toolkit». U.S. General Services Administration, 2015. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.citizenscience.gov/toolkit/howto/#

D. Fraisl, G. Hager, B. Bedessem, M. Gold, y P.-Y. Hsing, «Citizen science in environmental and ecological sciences», Nature Reviews Methods Primers, vol. 2, 2022, doi: doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00144-4.

ISO, «ISO 8000-62:2018: Information technology — Process assessment — Requirements for process reference, process assessment and maturity models», ISO. Accedido: 11 de abril de 2022. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/06/53/65340.html

ISO, «ISO/IEC 38505-1:2017 Information technology — Governance of IT — Governance of data — Part 1: Application of ISO/IEC 38500 to the governance of data», ISO/IEC 38505-1:2017 Information technology — Governance of IT — Governance of data — Part 1: Application of ISO/IEC 38500 to the governance of data. Accedido: 9 de mayo de 2021. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.iso.org/standard/56639.html

ISACA, COBIT 2019 Framework. Introduction and methodology. Schaumburg, IL. EE.UU, 2018.

DAMA, DAMA-DMBOK: data management body of knowledge. Technics Publications, LLC, 2017.

C. Wohlin y P. Runeson, «Guiding the selection of research methodology in industry–academia collaboration in software engineering», Information and Software Technology, vol. 140, p. 106678, dic. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106678.

D. E. Avison, R. M. Davison, y J. Malaurent, «Information systems action research: Debunking myths and overcoming barriers», Information & Management, vol. 55, n.o 2, pp. 177-187, mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2017.05.004.

M. Staron, Action Research in Software Engineering. Springer, 2020.

ISO, «ISO/IEC/IEEE 24774:2021 Systems and software engineering — Life cycle management — Specification for process description», ISO. Accedido: 11 de abril de 2022. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.iso.org/cms/render/live/en/sites/isoorg/contents/data/standard/07/89/78981.html

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

[1]
C. Guerra García, M. T. Ramírez Torres, H. Pérez González, and L. López López, “A Framework for Citizen Science Projects”, Perspectivas, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 72–80, May 2025.

Issue

Section

Artículos arbitrados

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.